<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Luc de Louw&#039;s Blog &#187; Virtualization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.delouw.ch/category/virtualization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.delouw.ch</link>
	<description>An IT guy is blogging</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 05:09:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A review of RHEV</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2011/02/27/a-review-of-rhev/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2011/02/27/a-review-of-rhev/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 16:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=1011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the past few weeks I had the chance to have a closer look at the current release 2.2. The reason is that I&#8217;m working on a project using RHEL6 clients as virtual Desktops. For a proof-of-concept I&#8217;ve set up a test environment in the lab. Due to the lack of time I was not [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2011/02/27/a-review-of-rhev/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spice and RHEV, a RHCE goes MCSE</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2011/01/11/spice-and-rhev-a-rhce-goes-mcse/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2011/01/11/spice-and-rhev-a-rhce-goes-mcse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 09:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LDAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m currently working in a project which includes some virtual Linux desktops. The desktop of choice is RHEL6. How to bring a Linux desktop via WAN to a thin client? VNC -> are you nuts? Remote X11 over SSH -> WAN = no go. NX -> another vendor involved. SPICE -> Spicy! But: Spice over [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2011/01/11/spice-and-rhev-a-rhce-goes-mcse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deploying RHEL as ESX guests &#8211; Kickstarting or using ESX templates?</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/10/20/deploying-rhel-as-esx-guests-kickstarting-or-using-esx-templates/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/10/20/deploying-rhel-as-esx-guests-kickstarting-or-using-esx-templates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cobbler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some time ago I asked my self the question if it is better to kickstart systems or working with ESX templates when deploying RHEL as ESX guests. I also had some discussions with friends working in the same industry. I tried it and came to the following conclusion: Kickstart the systems is the way to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/10/20/deploying-rhel-as-esx-guests-kickstarting-or-using-esx-templates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Experiences with RHEL6 Beta 2.1</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/07/23/experiences-with-rhel6-beta-2-1/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/07/23/experiences-with-rhel6-beta-2-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 07:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like promised I&#8217;ll keep you updated on the RHEL6b2.1. The &#8220;official name&#8221; is not Beta2.1, it is &#8220;Beta 2 refresh&#8221;. Why not calling it Beta3? Anyway: The good news first: In contrary to the first release of Beta 2, it works fine again! The first release of Beta2 was quite crappy, it was not installable [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/07/23/experiences-with-rhel6-beta-2-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is possibly going into RHEL6 GA and what is not</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/06/01/what-is-possibly-going-into-rhel6-ga-kernel-and-what-is-not/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/06/01/what-is-possibly-going-into-rhel6-ga-kernel-and-what-is-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 20:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL6]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I wrote different times before, RHEL6 is going to have a Kernel based on upstreams 2.6.32 Kernel. Meanwhile Linus Torvalds and his fellows released 2.6.34. Since then &#8211; from a System Engineers Point of view &#8211; there have some &#8220;minor&#8221; changes which are affecting the daily work in enterprise environments. I think that Red [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/06/01/what-is-possibly-going-into-rhel6-ga-kernel-and-what-is-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Red Hat&#8217;s virtualization strategy has redundancy &#8211; Quo vadis?</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/27/red-hats-virtualization-strategy-has-redundancy-quo-vadis/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/27/red-hats-virtualization-strategy-has-redundancy-quo-vadis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 18:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple of days there have been some reports that Red Hat will release a commercialized version of deltacloud, an abstraction layer for different kinds of virtualization technologies and clouds such as VMware, RHEV, Amazon EC2 etc. Red Hat puts a lot of resources on virtualization, they maintain and/or sponsor multiple projects in parallel. The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/27/red-hats-virtualization-strategy-has-redundancy-quo-vadis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>KVM supports live migration between CPUs with different features</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/15/kvm-supports-live-migration-between-cpus-with-different-features/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/15/kvm-supports-live-migration-between-cpus-with-different-features/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 10:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KVM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The video is a bit old, it is from November 2008. But it is still quite interesting to see and discuss about it. With KVM you can upgrade your farm of servers easy, it does not matter if the new servers have CPUs with new features or not. I&#8217;m not sure if you can do [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/15/kvm-supports-live-migration-between-cpus-with-different-features/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A brief test of RHEL 6 Beta 1</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/04/23/a-brief-test-of-rhel-6-beta-1/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/04/23/a-brief-test-of-rhel-6-beta-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 08:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Servers and Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upstart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As promised yesterday, I publish the results of a brief test of RHEL6 Beta 1 and the most important findings. It is my point of view as a system guys daily business. If not stated, this overview is based on a default installation with no customization. General There are new package groups such as  &#8220;Minimal&#8221; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/04/23/a-brief-test-of-rhel-6-beta-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roadmaps on the Red Hat Summit 2010 in Boston</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/03/15/roadmaps-on-the-red-hat-summit-2010-in-boston/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/03/15/roadmaps-on-the-red-hat-summit-2010-in-boston/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL6]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finally Red Hat disclosed the agenda of its summit in 2010. For more informations see http://www.redhat.com/promo/summit/2010/agenda/. RHEL6? Tim Burke of Red Hat will talk about the new features of RHEL6. It sounds like the present, not the future. Does this mean I&#8217;m right with my guess that RHEL6 will be released end of June like [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/03/15/roadmaps-on-the-red-hat-summit-2010-in-boston/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kernel questions about RHEL6, ESX support and experiences with F13a3</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/03/15/kernel-questions-about-rhel6-esx-support-and-experiences-with-f13a3/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/03/15/kernel-questions-about-rhel6-esx-support-and-experiences-with-f13a3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Still no official informations Red Hat is still refusing any questions about the features of RHEL 6 and its Linux Kernel. However: Since Vanilla Kernel 2.6.33 vmxnet3 and pvscsi is supported. Fedora 13 Alpha 3 is shipped with a derivate of Kernel 2.6.33. I still hope that Red Hat is switching to 2.6.33 or back-porting [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/03/15/kernel-questions-about-rhel6-esx-support-and-experiences-with-f13a3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

