<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Luc de Louw&#039;s Blog &#187; Web Servers and Applications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.delouw.ch/category/web-applications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.delouw.ch</link>
	<description>An IT guy is blogging</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 05:09:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A brief test of OTRS::ITSM Changemanagement and the insanity of ITIL compliant software</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/23/a-brief-test-of-otrsitsm-changemanagement-and-the-insanity-of-itil-compliant-software/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/23/a-brief-test-of-otrsitsm-changemanagement-and-the-insanity-of-itil-compliant-software/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 18:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Servers and Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITIL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTRS is known as best-of-breed in open source incident management systems. Since quite some time, OTRS made its product ITIL V3 compliant. Means: It also comes with a change management module. At work we use a complex and extremely user-unfriedly software. This brought me to the idea to test the OTRS change management module in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/23/a-brief-test-of-otrsitsm-changemanagement-and-the-insanity-of-itil-compliant-software/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IUS Community RPMs for Red Hats RHEL</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/16/ius-community-rpms-for-red-hats-rhel/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/16/ius-community-rpms-for-red-hats-rhel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 15:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Servers and Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CentOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was criticizing that software in RHEL is too outdated for web servers quite soon after release, see my blog post http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/02/rhel6-as-a-web-server/. While this is true for a system fully supported by Red Hat, I learned an alternative from a comment on the post. This alternative is the so called IUS community repository. About the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/16/ius-community-rpms-for-red-hats-rhel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An example why open source software is cool</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/15/an-example-why-open-source-software-is-cool/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/15/an-example-why-open-source-software-is-cool/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 10:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Servers and Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opensource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tomcat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently I have set up an Apache Tomcat. As a replacement for the Tomcat manager I deployed Psi-Probe for easy deployment and access to statistics. Afterwards I installed the production software which needs to add a JVM parameter user.country=CH to have the proper date and time format used in Switzerland. This had a unwanted side-effect [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/15/an-example-why-open-source-software-is-cool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apache HTTP server and its further development</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/03/apache-http-server-and-its-further-development/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/03/apache-http-server-and-its-further-development/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 23:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Servers and Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opensource]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Apache httpd is one of the most stable software pieces which is still in use. The latest huge step forward was with the release of 2.0. Quo vadis Apache httpd? The most current release is 2.2.15. During the 2.2.x release cycle, there have basically been only bug-fix releases (Okay, response header rewrite starting on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/03/apache-http-server-and-its-further-development/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ubuntu 10.04 LTS released</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/02/ubuntu-10-04-lts-released/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/02/ubuntu-10-04-lts-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 21:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Servers and Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[End of April 2010, Ubuntu 10.04 was released. As always it is based on Debian&#8217;s Testing-Release. Canonical &#8220;stabilizes&#8221; the testing tree of Debian and adds its own look. This time, Ubuntu radically changed its look. From my point of view it looks ugly, very ugly. Strange colors, low contrasts in menus, orange icons in Nautilus&#8230; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/02/ubuntu-10-04-lts-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RHEL6 as a web server</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/02/rhel6-as-a-web-server/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/02/rhel6-as-a-web-server/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 20:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Servers and Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL6]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New software versions Today I&#8217;m writing about the changes and benefits of RHEL6 as a web server compared to RHEL5. Red Hat is well known for its stable API and ABI over the life-cycle of a major release. For some usage types this is a major problem. Sticking to old version of PHP, MySQL, Tomcat [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/02/rhel6-as-a-web-server/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A brief test of RHEL 6 Beta 1</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/04/23/a-brief-test-of-rhel-6-beta-1/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/04/23/a-brief-test-of-rhel-6-beta-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 08:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Servers and Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upstart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As promised yesterday, I publish the results of a brief test of RHEL6 Beta 1 and the most important findings. It is my point of view as a system guys daily business. If not stated, this overview is based on a default installation with no customization. General There are new package groups such as  &#8220;Minimal&#8221; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/04/23/a-brief-test-of-rhel-6-beta-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>302 Redirects behind SSL-terminating proxies</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2009/10/29/302-redirect-behind-ssl-terminating-proxies/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2009/10/29/302-redirect-behind-ssl-terminating-proxies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SUSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Servers and Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apache]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You have a web site all with SSL. There is a reverse proxy or load balancer that acts as SSL termination point. Behind that reverse proxy you have an Apache web server running plain http.

Your application uses 302 redirects to announce new URLs or whatever the reason is for doing so. Since the web server does not know that https URLs should be announced the response header looks like following:
<blockquote>Location <code>http://www.example.com/your-fancy-url</code></blockquote>
The browser interprets that location header and send a request to this non-SSL URL instead of https://<code>/www.example.com/your-fancy-url </code>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2009/10/29/302-redirect-behind-ssl-terminating-proxies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

