<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Luc de Louw&#039;s Blog &#187; Linux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.delouw.ch/tag/linux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.delouw.ch</link>
	<description>An IT guy is blogging</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 05:09:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Epson scanners on Linux systems</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2011/01/11/epson-scanners-on-linux-systems/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2011/01/11/epson-scanners-on-linux-systems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 21:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SUSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fedora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenSuse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve got a Epson Perfection 1260 Photo scanner. Fedora like other distributions such as OpenSuse are recognizing the device since a long long time. The back end chosen for the device is plustek. Unfortunately when using the default configuration one experience very strange effects with colours. The left and the right 50% of the picture [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2011/01/11/epson-scanners-on-linux-systems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Usability Fedora vs Windows</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/11/30/usability-fedora-vs-windows/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/11/30/usability-fedora-vs-windows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 08:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fedora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m writing this post sitting in a train, connected to the internet via UMTS. The device is a Huawai E220 HSDPA modem connected via USB. Guess who is the winner? Procedure to get the device running on Fedora (first time usage): Plug in the device on any USB port Enter the PIN in the pop-up [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/11/30/usability-fedora-vs-windows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deploying RHEL as ESX guests &#8211; Kickstarting or using ESX templates?</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/10/20/deploying-rhel-as-esx-guests-kickstarting-or-using-esx-templates/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/10/20/deploying-rhel-as-esx-guests-kickstarting-or-using-esx-templates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cobbler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some time ago I asked my self the question if it is better to kickstart systems or working with ESX templates when deploying RHEL as ESX guests. I also had some discussions with friends working in the same industry. I tried it and came to the following conclusion: Kickstart the systems is the way to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/10/20/deploying-rhel-as-esx-guests-kickstarting-or-using-esx-templates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RHN Inter-Satellite-Sync is kind of tricky and picky</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/05/rhn-inter-satellite-sync-is-kind-of-tricky-and-picky/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/05/rhn-inter-satellite-sync-is-kind-of-tricky-and-picky/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 20:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHN Satellite]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you try to establish an ISS (Inter Satellite Sync) between two RHN Satellites, do not fully trust the documentation. A slave Satellite must be named by a hostname (IP is not enough) and must have an A and a PTR DNS record or have an /etc/hosts entry. Check it before restarting the satellite by [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/05/rhn-inter-satellite-sync-is-kind-of-tricky-and-picky/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spacewalk 1.0 released</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/02/spacewalk-1-0-released/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/02/spacewalk-1-0-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 22:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CentOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHN Satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spacewalk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spacewalk 1.0 has been released Spacewalk is the upstream project for Red Hat&#8217;s RHN Satellite software, one of the best systems management software available for Linux Systems. In the past few weeks one could see a lot of git commits on the source repository of spacewalk. There is no changelog available yet. The road map [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/02/spacewalk-1-0-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ubuntu 10.04 LTS released</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/02/ubuntu-10-04-lts-released/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/02/ubuntu-10-04-lts-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 21:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Servers and Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[End of April 2010, Ubuntu 10.04 was released. As always it is based on Debian&#8217;s Testing-Release. Canonical &#8220;stabilizes&#8221; the testing tree of Debian and adds its own look. This time, Ubuntu radically changed its look. From my point of view it looks ugly, very ugly. Strange colors, low contrasts in menus, orange icons in Nautilus&#8230; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/02/ubuntu-10-04-lts-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A brief test of RHEL 6 Beta 1</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/04/23/a-brief-test-of-rhel-6-beta-1/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/04/23/a-brief-test-of-rhel-6-beta-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 08:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Servers and Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upstart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As promised yesterday, I publish the results of a brief test of RHEL6 Beta 1 and the most important findings. It is my point of view as a system guys daily business. If not stated, this overview is based on a default installation with no customization. General There are new package groups such as  &#8220;Minimal&#8221; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/04/23/a-brief-test-of-rhel-6-beta-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RHEL 6 public beta released</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/04/22/rhel-6-public-beta-released/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/04/22/rhel-6-public-beta-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 06:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL6]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Red announced the first public beta release of its next Enterprise Linux. It can be downloaded at Red Hats FTP Server. You can expect a brief test later this day. Share and Enjoy:]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/04/22/rhel-6-public-beta-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roadmaps on the Red Hat Summit 2010 in Boston</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/03/15/roadmaps-on-the-red-hat-summit-2010-in-boston/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/03/15/roadmaps-on-the-red-hat-summit-2010-in-boston/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL6]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finally Red Hat disclosed the agenda of its summit in 2010. For more informations see http://www.redhat.com/promo/summit/2010/agenda/. RHEL6? Tim Burke of Red Hat will talk about the new features of RHEL6. It sounds like the present, not the future. Does this mean I&#8217;m right with my guess that RHEL6 will be released end of June like [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/03/15/roadmaps-on-the-red-hat-summit-2010-in-boston/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kernel questions about RHEL6, ESX support and experiences with F13a3</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/03/15/kernel-questions-about-rhel6-esx-support-and-experiences-with-f13a3/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/03/15/kernel-questions-about-rhel6-esx-support-and-experiences-with-f13a3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Still no official informations Red Hat is still refusing any questions about the features of RHEL 6 and its Linux Kernel. However: Since Vanilla Kernel 2.6.33 vmxnet3 and pvscsi is supported. Fedora 13 Alpha 3 is shipped with a derivate of Kernel 2.6.33. I still hope that Red Hat is switching to 2.6.33 or back-porting [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/03/15/kernel-questions-about-rhel6-esx-support-and-experiences-with-f13a3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

