<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Luc de Louw&#039;s Blog &#187; Reliability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.delouw.ch/tag/reliability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.delouw.ch</link>
	<description>An IT guy is blogging</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 05:09:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Identity Management with RHEL 6.2 Part I</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2011/12/17/identity-management-with-rhel-6-2-part-i/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2011/12/17/identity-management-with-rhel-6-2-part-i/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 19:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identity Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kerberos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LDAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=1285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Red Hat released RHEL 6.2 on December 6th. From my point of view, the greatest news in the release is that IPA (or now called Identity Management) is now fully supported and available in the RHEL 6 base channel without additional subscription costs. Upstream project is freeIPA and is available trough the default Fedora repos. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2011/12/17/identity-management-with-rhel-6-2-part-i/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Implement a high available Cobbler provisioning system</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2011/04/24/implement-a-high-available-cobbler-provisioning-system/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2011/04/24/implement-a-high-available-cobbler-provisioning-system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 19:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cobbler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=1201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A not so well known feature of Cobbler is its replication facility. It allows you to create a high available system provisioning system. The whole set up is straight forward. Background Today people tend to NOT backup systems, only data is being backed up. In the case of a system failure, they just re-provisioning the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2011/04/24/implement-a-high-available-cobbler-provisioning-system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ubuntu 10.04 LTS released</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/02/ubuntu-10-04-lts-released/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/02/ubuntu-10-04-lts-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 21:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Servers and Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[End of April 2010, Ubuntu 10.04 was released. As always it is based on Debian&#8217;s Testing-Release. Canonical &#8220;stabilizes&#8221; the testing tree of Debian and adds its own look. This time, Ubuntu radically changed its look. From my point of view it looks ugly, very ugly. Strange colors, low contrasts in menus, orange icons in Nautilus&#8230; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/02/ubuntu-10-04-lts-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Confused about write barriers on file systems&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2009/11/01/confused-about-write-barriers-on-file-systems/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2009/11/01/confused-about-write-barriers-on-file-systems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 06:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barrier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ext3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filesystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=83</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As ext3 is already known as a very robust file system why is the default mount option still barrier=0? The problem is LVM and the device mapper. They  do not support barriers. When mounting ext3 on a LV, the option barrier=1 it should be ignored and a warning written. So far so good. Trying this brings [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2009/11/01/confused-about-write-barriers-on-file-systems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

