<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Luc de Louw&#039;s Blog &#187; RHEL6</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.delouw.ch/tag/rhel6/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.delouw.ch</link>
	<description>An IT guy is blogging</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 05:09:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>RHEL6.1 and Red Hat is changing its subscription methods</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2011/02/16/rhel6-1-and-red-hat-is-changing-its-subscription-methods/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2011/02/16/rhel6-1-and-red-hat-is-changing-its-subscription-methods/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 20:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHN Satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just got an email with the subject &#8220;Opportunity for Red Hat Certified Professionals to test new Red Hat software&#8221;. Quoting the email: " The new subscription management tools provide a very different user experience than today’s Red Hat Network (RHN). We would like to get your feedback on the software so that we can [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2011/02/16/rhel6-1-and-red-hat-is-changing-its-subscription-methods/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some impressive figures about Spacewalk and my two cents</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/12/22/some-impressive-figures-about-spacewalk-and-my-two-cents/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/12/22/some-impressive-figures-about-spacewalk-and-my-two-cents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHN Satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spacewalk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, I saw a interessing post on the spacewalk-devel mailing list. Lines of code Spacewalk has 2,908,841 lines of code, created in estimated 843 person years. This means 843 developers are needed to rewrite Spacewalk from scratch in one year! That&#8217;s amazing. Number of bugs fixed As stated in the post, the Spacewalk-team fixed 1012 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/12/22/some-impressive-figures-about-spacewalk-and-my-two-cents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RHEL6 is released!</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/11/10/rhel6-is-released/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/11/10/rhel6-is-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 19:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHN Satellite]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RHEL6 was just released at 2010-11-10 20:09:50 CET. Quoting Red Hat press relase: Today, we delivered Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 to the market. @Red Hat: you are so mean! Next time inform your fellows one day in advance to give your fellows the chance to fill the fridges with champagne! I did not checked [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/11/10/rhel6-is-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RHN Satellite 5.4, first analysis</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/11/01/rhn-satellite-5-4-first-analysis/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/11/01/rhn-satellite-5-4-first-analysis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 22:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHN Satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spacewalk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First of all: Where is the Red Hat Press release? Nada, nothing, nichts (yet)&#8230;. History As I wrote in my previous post, I&#8217;ll keep you posted with my latest findings. In another post, I was speculating about the upstream version. Now, Sat540 seems to be based on Spacewalk 1.2 which is not yet released. I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/11/01/rhn-satellite-5-4-first-analysis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rumours about RHEL6 GA end of October 2010</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/09/20/rumours-about-rhel6-ga-end-of-october-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/09/20/rumours-about-rhel6-ga-end-of-october-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 06:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHN Satellite]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest unofficial rumors about the release date of RHEL6 are pointing to end of October 2010. This is a bit more precise than the official statement &#8220;later this year&#8220;. There are multiple sources of this rumors, so it can be considered truthful but still not as a fact. Hopefully RHN Satellite 5.4 will be [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/09/20/rumours-about-rhel6-ga-end-of-october-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RHN Satellite 5.4 release in sight</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/09/07/rhn-satellite-5-4-release-in-sight/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/09/07/rhn-satellite-5-4-release-in-sight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 05:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHN Satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spacewalk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When analyzing recent Bugzilla-reports and mailing list posts, we can expect a RHN Satellite release quite soon. Why? The main reason for this is the lack of SHA256 support in sat530. Since RHEL6 packages having SHA256 checksums, the release of Satellite 5.4 is a prerequisite for releasing RHEL6. As always there will also be a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/09/07/rhn-satellite-5-4-release-in-sight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Experiences with RHEL6 Beta 2.1</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/07/23/experiences-with-rhel6-beta-2-1/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/07/23/experiences-with-rhel6-beta-2-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 07:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like promised I&#8217;ll keep you updated on the RHEL6b2.1. The &#8220;official name&#8221; is not Beta2.1, it is &#8220;Beta 2 refresh&#8221;. Why not calling it Beta3? Anyway: The good news first: In contrary to the first release of Beta 2, it works fine again! The first release of Beta2 was quite crappy, it was not installable [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/07/23/experiences-with-rhel6-beta-2-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RHEL6 Beta2 &#8211; experiences so far</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/07/03/rhel6-beta2-experiances-so-far/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/07/03/rhel6-beta2-experiances-so-far/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 09:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL6]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In short: It was a non-experience because the RHEL 6 Beta 2 distribution is not installable&#8230; [Update]It is not a anaconda bug, but a bug in a paravirt driver. On ESX installation runs smooth, expect a more detailed report in the next few days[/update] While downloading the ISO, I was very curious about it and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/07/03/rhel6-beta2-experiances-so-far/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Red Hat released RHEL6 Beta 2!</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/06/30/red-hat-released-rhel6-beta-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/06/30/red-hat-released-rhel6-beta-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 19:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL6]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As announced on the mailing list rhelv5-announce@redhat.com, Red Hat released beta2 of it upcoming RHEL6 enterprise product. I&#8217;m actually disappointed by Red Hat, I was thinking that RHEL6 will be released GA on the summit a few days ago. It was not released. And instead of communicating a date, even a approximate date, the only [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/06/30/red-hat-released-rhel6-beta-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is possibly going into RHEL6 GA and what is not</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/06/01/what-is-possibly-going-into-rhel6-ga-kernel-and-what-is-not/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/06/01/what-is-possibly-going-into-rhel6-ga-kernel-and-what-is-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 20:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL6]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I wrote different times before, RHEL6 is going to have a Kernel based on upstreams 2.6.32 Kernel. Meanwhile Linus Torvalds and his fellows released 2.6.34. Since then &#8211; from a System Engineers Point of view &#8211; there have some &#8220;minor&#8221; changes which are affecting the daily work in enterprise environments. I think that Red [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/06/01/what-is-possibly-going-into-rhel6-ga-kernel-and-what-is-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

