<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Luc de Louw&#039;s Blog &#187; Spacewalk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.delouw.ch/tag/spacewalk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.delouw.ch</link>
	<description>An IT guy is blogging</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 05:09:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Cross distribution system management with Spacewalk</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2011/05/24/cross-distribution-system-management-with-spacewalk/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2011/05/24/cross-distribution-system-management-with-spacewalk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 09:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SUSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SLES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spacewalk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=1227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a perfect world, all systems in a data centre are running the same Linux operating system, a homogeneous system landscape. In real life things are working differently. Windows systems are out of focus in this post, lets concentrate on Linux systems. Most companies with a large Linux base are either RHEL shops or using [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2011/05/24/cross-distribution-system-management-with-spacewalk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SUSE Manager based on Fedora Spacewalk</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2011/03/03/suse-manager-based-on-fedora-spacewalk/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2011/03/03/suse-manager-based-on-fedora-spacewalk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 20:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SUSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linkedin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHN Satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SLES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spacewalk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=1084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SUSE announced the availability of SUSE manager. Having a closer look to it, one recognizes it is based on Fedora Spacewalk. It is a clone of the Red Hat Satellite. A few weeks ago I was puzzled to see a post on the spacewalk-devel mailing list. SUSE was contributing some code. What the heck? Now [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2011/03/03/suse-manager-based-on-fedora-spacewalk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some impressive figures about Spacewalk and my two cents</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/12/22/some-impressive-figures-about-spacewalk-and-my-two-cents/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/12/22/some-impressive-figures-about-spacewalk-and-my-two-cents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHN Satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spacewalk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, I saw a interessing post on the spacewalk-devel mailing list. Lines of code Spacewalk has 2,908,841 lines of code, created in estimated 843 person years. This means 843 developers are needed to rewrite Spacewalk from scratch in one year! That&#8217;s amazing. Number of bugs fixed As stated in the post, the Spacewalk-team fixed 1012 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/12/22/some-impressive-figures-about-spacewalk-and-my-two-cents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Important RHN Satellite 5.4 bugs has been fixed</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/12/15/important-rhn-satellite-5-4-bugs-has-been-fixed/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/12/15/important-rhn-satellite-5-4-bugs-has-been-fixed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 20:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHN Satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spacewalk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Red Hat recently released some bugfixes for the RHN-Satellite version 5.4. They needed approx. one month to develop a fix for those serious bugs. If you upgraded to sat540 before those bugsfixes have been released you will have a crippled database. The errata provides a way how to fix it. It needs some time, but [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/12/15/important-rhn-satellite-5-4-bugs-has-been-fixed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pulp, what is it about it?</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/12/02/pulp-what-is-it-about-it/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/12/02/pulp-what-is-it-about-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 22:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fedora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHN Satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spacewalk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to Máirín&#8217;s posting I got aware of the Pulp project. What is it? I had a brief look at it, it is a Red Hat sponsored project with a similar functionality like Spacewalk and RHN Satellite. This brings me to the question: Is Pulp is intended to be a replacement of Spacewalk? It can [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/12/02/pulp-what-is-it-about-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spacewalk 1.2 released -&gt; PostgreSQL Support quite ready -&gt; First analysis</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/11/20/spacewalk-1-2-released-postgresql-support-quite-ready-first-analysis/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/11/20/spacewalk-1-2-released-postgresql-support-quite-ready-first-analysis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 23:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHN Satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spacewalk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, Spacewalk &#8211; the upstream project of the RHN satellite &#8211; released version 1.2. One of the promises the developers made was better support of PostgreSQL. It seems that lot of stuff is now working. As I promised, I&#8217;m going to examine whats working and whats not. I&#8217;ll file every single bug I&#8217;ll find, please [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/11/20/spacewalk-1-2-released-postgresql-support-quite-ready-first-analysis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RHN Satellite 5.4, first analysis</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/11/01/rhn-satellite-5-4-first-analysis/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/11/01/rhn-satellite-5-4-first-analysis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 22:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHN Satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spacewalk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First of all: Where is the Red Hat Press release? Nada, nothing, nichts (yet)&#8230;. History As I wrote in my previous post, I&#8217;ll keep you posted with my latest findings. In another post, I was speculating about the upstream version. Now, Sat540 seems to be based on Spacewalk 1.2 which is not yet released. I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/11/01/rhn-satellite-5-4-first-analysis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spacewalk is moving further to PostgreSQL support</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/10/05/spacewalk-moving-further-to-postgresql-support/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/10/05/spacewalk-moving-further-to-postgresql-support/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 20:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHN Satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spacewalk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The upstream of RHN Satellite &#8211; Spacewalk &#8211; is moving further to database indepedancy, with the scope of PostgreSQL compatiblity. How I come to this conclusion? Read the git commit logs. At FUDCon 2010 in Zurich I was attending Miroslav&#8217;s talk. He was complaining that nobody gives the PostgreSQL-version a try. He is right, on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/10/05/spacewalk-moving-further-to-postgresql-support/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RHN Satellite 5.4 release in sight</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/09/07/rhn-satellite-5-4-release-in-sight/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/09/07/rhn-satellite-5-4-release-in-sight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 05:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHN Satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spacewalk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When analyzing recent Bugzilla-reports and mailing list posts, we can expect a RHN Satellite release quite soon. Why? The main reason for this is the lack of SHA256 support in sat530. Since RHEL6 packages having SHA256 checksums, the release of Satellite 5.4 is a prerequisite for releasing RHEL6. As always there will also be a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/09/07/rhn-satellite-5-4-release-in-sight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CentOS 5.5 released</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/16/centos-5-5-released/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/16/centos-5-5-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 12:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CentOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spacewalk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On May 15, the CentOS project released version 5.5 of its enterprise Linux. It is based on the sources of RHEL5.5 which was released on March, 31. Unfortunately they &#8211; like always &#8211; removed the rhn-client-tools and friends from upstream. This is a pity, since it takes more efforts to manage CentOS-installation in Spacewalk. For [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/16/centos-5-5-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

