<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Luc de Louw&#039;s Blog &#187; Ubuntu</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.delouw.ch/tag/ubuntu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.delouw.ch</link>
	<description>An IT guy is blogging</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 05:09:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Ubuntu 10.04 LTS released</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/02/ubuntu-10-04-lts-released/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/02/ubuntu-10-04-lts-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 21:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Servers and Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[End of April 2010, Ubuntu 10.04 was released. As always it is based on Debian&#8217;s Testing-Release. Canonical &#8220;stabilizes&#8221; the testing tree of Debian and adds its own look. This time, Ubuntu radically changed its look. From my point of view it looks ugly, very ugly. Strange colors, low contrasts in menus, orange icons in Nautilus&#8230; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2010/05/02/ubuntu-10-04-lts-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ready to upstart?</title>
		<link>http://blog.delouw.ch/2009/10/31/ready-to-upstart/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.delouw.ch/2009/10/31/ready-to-upstart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 09:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luc de Louw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SUSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upstart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.delouw.ch/?p=58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is time to replace the aged SysV init system with someting better At the time when  SysV init (pronounced &#8220;System five&#8221;) appeared, hardware configurations have been quite static, no hot plug and similar fancy stuff. SysV init is started after the kernel is loaded. The init process reads /etc/inittab and walks trough the runcontrol [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.delouw.ch/2009/10/31/ready-to-upstart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

